| 
   
       
       Resource 1 
       
       Tea Party Questions 
        My definition of assessment is
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
I think teachers assess because
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
I am concerned about assessment because
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The most important objective of assessment to me is
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Some of the best examples of assessment I have seen in practice are
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Some types of assessment that would be particularly useful in a coastal 
          and marine studies context would be
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Resource 2  
       
       Some Teacher's Views On Assessment 
  
       Questions
        Do any of these statements match your views? 
          
        Which have relevance to coastal and marine studies? Why? 
 Teachers' Views
         
         It's to do with the tests and exams we set involving learning. 
          
        It's finding out how good children are at developing understanding. 
          
        It's something we use to keep a check on children in classes. 
          
        Assessment is all about finding out if we are effective in our lessons. 
          
        It's finding out children's strengths and weaknesses in learning. 
          
        It's something that the educational psychologist does. 
          
        It's something we use to sort out children. 
          
        It's something done by the examinations authority and the education 
          department. 
          
        Assessment is all about keeping records of children's marks and things 
          like that. 
          
        It's to do with the government raising standards of environmental 
          understanding and awareness. 
          
        Assessment is all about finding out where children need help.  
 
 
 Resource 3  
       
       Changing Views on Assessment 
         
         
          | Source: Stimpson, P. (1995) The Assessment 
            of Learning within Environmental Education, Learning for a Sustainable 
            Environment: Innovations in Teacher Education Through Environmental 
            Education, UNESCO Asia-Pacific Centre of Educational Innovation 
            for Development, Bangkok, draft module. |   
          | Let me not mince words. Almost all educators 
            feel that testing is a necessary part of education. I wholly disagree - 
            I do not think that testing is necessary, or useful, or even excusable. 
            At best, testing does more harm than good; at worst it hinders, distorts, 
            and corrupts the learning process. Testers say that testing techniques 
            are being continually improved and can eventually be perfected. Maybe 
            so - but no imaginable improvement in testing would overcome my objections 
            to it. Our chief concern should not be to improve testing, but to 
            find ways to eliminate it. [W]e teachers say that we test children to find out what they have 
              learned, so that we can better know how to help them learn more. 
              This is about ninety-five percent untrue. There are two main reasons 
              why we test children: the first is to threaten them into doing what 
              we want done, and the second is to give us a basis for handing out 
              rewards and penalties on which the educational system - like 
              all coercive systems - must operate. 
              
             Holt (1969) pp. 51-52. | It is a central argument of this book that 
            assessment should play a critical part in any educational process. 
            Wherever learning takes place, or is intended that it should take 
            place, then it is reasonable for the learner, the teacher and other 
            interested parties to be curious about what has happened both in terms 
            of the learning process and in terms of any anticipated or un-anticipated 
            outcomes. We would argue that good education, by definition, encompasses 
            good assessment. However, we would wish to disassociate ourselves 
            immediately from much of what has gone under the guise of 'good' educational 
            assessment... Assessment has been viewed for far too long as a formal 
            process, which normally involves the administration of formal tests 
            and examinations through procedures that are totally divorced from 
            the educational process and setting to which they are supposed to 
            relate. Murphy and Torrance (1988) p.7. |  
 
 
 Resource 4  
       
       What is Assessment for?
         
         
          | Source: Stimpson, P. (1995) The Assessment of Learning within Environmental 
            Education, Learning for a Sustainable Environment: Innovations 
            in Teacher Education Through Environmental Education, UNESCO Asia-Pacific 
            Centre of Educational Innovation for Development, Bangkok, draft module. |   
       
        To find out what students know about the coastal and marine studies, 
          what they understand, and what they can do. 
          
        To find out what students do not know, do not understand and cannot 
          do. 
          
        To provide a basis for feedback to learners to help them in their 
          coastal and marine studies. 
          
        To motivate learners to learn about the environment and for the environment. 
          
        To motivate environmental educators. 
          
        To support teaching and learning in coastal and marine studies. 
          
        To monitor and control standards on coastal and marine studies through 
          certification. 
          
        To act as a measure for the accountability of coastal and marine studies 
          educators. 
          
        To raise educational standards in environmental awareness, understanding 
          and action. 
          
        To improve environmental curricula. 
          
        To see whether learning objectives in coastal and marine studies are 
          being met. 
          
        To rank order students by level of environmental learning. 
          
        To diagnose environmental learning problems and needs. 
          
        To diagnose teaching problems as a basis for evaluating the needs 
          of schools. 
          
        To screen students who may not be environmentally aware or active. 
          
        To select people for future careers or learning paths in coastal and 
          marine studies (eg. to stream children). 
          
        To provide parents and others outside the school with information 
          about the environmental learning of children. 
          
        To predict likely future environmental attitudes and actions of students 
          (and teachers and schools!).  
 
 
 Resource 5 
       
       Two Assessment Situations  
       
         
         
          | Source: Stimpson, P. (1995) The Assessment of Learning within Environmental 
            Education, Learning for a Sustainable Environment: Innovations 
            in Teacher Education Through Environmental Education, UNESCO Asia-Pacific 
            Centre of Educational Innovation for Development, Bangkok, draft module. |  Sketch A
 
 
 Yim-lin comes into her class of eleven year olds. She asks whether they 
        have all brought their lunch and with what they have wrapped their sandwiches. 
        Most of the children have used cling-film. "Why did they use it?" Yim-lin 
        asks. She continues, "What will they do with the cling-film when they 
        have finished eating?" The morning develops with a lesson on plastics, 
        how they are made, their impact on material and energy resources and the 
        problems they pose as waste. The children become interested in investigating 
        the way in which plastic waste enters the sea and the effects this has 
        on marine mammals. The children conclude the day by completing a set of 
        worksheet questions based on a library search. 
       Sketch B
 
 
 At the end of Year 6, Yim-lin's 11 year-olds would be moving 
        to secondary school. There was a question of which school students would 
        go to and what particular problems students might carry with them. Yim-lin 
        gave the class a set of graded questions to test the children's level 
        of knowledge. She also asked the children to complete a self-reporting 
        questionnaire to assess pupil's attitudes and environmental/community 
        awareness; she used this information to generate a descriptive profile 
        for each child. 
       Questions
 
        List differences in the foci of assessment in the two sketches. 
          
        Use the descriptive terms given in Resource 6 to analyse the 
          form of assessment which is taking place in each. What are the main 
          differences of purpose?  
 
 
 Resource 6  
       
       How to Assess 
       
         
         
          | Source: Stimpson, P. (1995) The Assessment of Learning within Environmental 
            Education, Learning for a Sustainable Environment: Innovations 
            in Teacher Education Through Environmental Education, UNESCO Asia-Pacific 
            Centre of Educational Innovation for Development, Bangkok, draft module. |  There is often a tension in environmental education between summative 
        and formative, formal and informal, and terminal and continuous assessment 
        as they may emphasise different aspects of learning and seek to perform 
        different educational functions.
 Formative assessment emphasises the on-going collection of information 
        about children's learning in coastal and marine studies which is used 
        to make decisions about how to enhance the learning capability of students. 
        Its main purpose is to assist learning. It is largely a matter between 
        the learner and the teacher and is described as 'low stakes' assessment. 
        It is often informal and usually non-judgemental. It is concerned with 
        what students can do and helping them with what they cannot do in relation 
        to expected criteria. Consequently, it is often either implicitly or explicitly 
        criterion-referenced in terms of environmental knowledge, enquiry skills 
        or values.
 Summative assessment occurs at the end of a study and often reflects 
        the final product of learning. It is generally judgemental and is often 
        described as 'high stakes' assessment as it may be a critical determinant 
        of access to future learning paths or jobs. It is often concerned with 
        ranking people and is consequently norm-referenced in terms of relative 
        environmental understanding of students.
 Informal assessment occurs as an inevitable, integral part of day-to-day 
        classroom activities, eg. teacher questioning, classroom observation, 
        home and class-work. It is often uncontrolled and seeks to be unobtrusive. 
        It is responsive to the needs of students. Spin-offs for learning are 
        generally at the forefront of the teacher's mind.
 Formal assessment has no direct teaching function. Its sole function 
        is to provide knowledge about environmental education achievements for 
        someone else. It usually takes the form of tests and occurs at defined 
        times within conventional examination settings. It is contrived and there 
        are generally predetermined answers. The significance of data collected 
        is usually for summative purposes.
 Terminal assessment occurs only once at the end of the coastal and 
        marine studies programme or at the end of a stage in the programme. It 
        is consequently periodic and final. It is often associated with formal 
        examinations in environmental education.
 Continuous assessment is intermittent, regular and cumulative. It 
        is often, though not inevitably, associated with course-work assessment 
        in environmental education.
 
 
 
 Resource 7 
       
       Possible Methods of Assessment in Coastal and Marine Studies 
       
         
         
          | Source: Stimpson, P. (1995) The Assessment of Learning within Environmental 
            Education, Learning for a Sustainable Environment: Innovations 
            in Teacher Education Through Environmental Education, UNESCO Asia-Pacific 
            Centre of Educational Innovation for Development, Bangkok, draft module. |   
      
 
         
         
          | Learning Objective | Assessment Method | Suitability for Formative
 | Suitability for Summative
 |   
          | Knowledge | Completion items | ? | Y |   
          | Multiple choice (MC) | ? | Y |   
          | Short answer questions | Y | Y |   
          | Data analysis and 
            interpretation | Structured questions | Y | Y |   
          | Laboratory practicals | Y? |  |   
          | Field work | Y | Y |   
          | Reporting | Oral presentation | Y | ? |   
          | Essay | Y | Y |   
          | Report/Assignment | Y | ? |   
          | Individual/Group research project | Y | ? |   
          | Decision making | Structured questions | Y | Y |   
          | Decision-making exercises | Y | Y |   
          | Projects | Y | ? |   
          | Role play | Y | ? |   
          | Attitudes and values | Oral presentation | Y | ? |   
          | Classroom observation | Y | ? |   
          | Self-evaluation profile | Y | ? |   
          | Teacher produced profile | Y | Y |   
          | Action | Observation of student's actions | Y | ? |   
          | Self-evaluation profile | Y | ? |   
          | Y=Yes       
            ?=uncertain/difficult |  
 
 
 Resource 8 
       
       Assessment Methods for Coastal and Marine Studies- Merits and Pitfalls
         
         
          | Source: Stimpson, P. (1995) The Assessment of Learning within Environmental 
            Education, Learning for a Sustainable Environment: Innovations 
            in Teacher Education Through Environmental Education, UNESCO Asia-Pacific 
            Centre of Educational Innovation for Development, Bangkok, draft module. |  
 
         
         
          | Method | Examples | Comment |   
          | Knowledge | Multiple choice (MC), completion, matching, true/false assertion 
            reasoning, short answer questions. | Wide curriculum coverage possible; risk of over-emphasis on facts; 
            easy to mark but can be difficult to construct forms which assess 
            higher order learning; can trivialise learning. |   
          | Essays | Timed essays, resource based essay, extended writing, reports, open-book 
            examinations | Easy to construct; difficult to mark reliably; good for higher order 
            thinking skills (e.g. evaluation) and argument; may overemphasise 
            writing; require criteria for useful feedback. |   
          | Projects/Enquiries | Based on field work or on secondary data. | Assess ability to identify, describe, analyse and draw conclusions; 
            emphasises study and information processing skills; risk of copious 
            copying; time consuming to mark; need criteria for effective marking 
            and feedback. |   
          | Structured questions | Stimulus response, data based. Many of the advantages of projects 
            but more restricted, manageable and easier to mark; can trivialise 
            learning and generate routine responses. | Many of the advantages of projects but more restricted, manageable 
            and easier to mark; can trivialise learning and generate routine responses. |   
          | Oral assessment | Presentations, debates, drama, discussion groups. | Can encourage outgoing students to think creatively about the environment 
            but the shy may be overwhelmed; time consuming; perhaps the least 
            permanent and structured form of evidence; difficult to grade without 
            set criteria; useful in formative assessment. |   
          | Classroom observation | Teacher notes, checklists, comment banks, profiles, interviews. | Rich source of evidence of enviro-sensitive behaviour; very time 
            consuming and therefore a problem with large classes; risk of data 
            overload; difficult to grade without set procedures and criteria. |   
          | Self- assessment | Student checklists, diaries, peer group assessment, negotiated self-reports, 
            can-do statements | Can be (but not always) rewarding for students; difficult to set 
            up as an effective tool; needs practice and time to acclimatise to 
            method. |  
 
 
 Resource 9 
       
       Meeting the Objectives of Coastal and Marine Studies
         
         
          |  | Knowledge | Awareness | Skills/Problem Solving | Attitudes | Actions |   
          | Objective tests |  |  |  |  |  |   
          | Short answer |  |  |  |  |  |   
          | Essay |  |  |  |  |  |   
          | Decision making |  |  |  |  |  |   
          | Checklists |  |  |  |  |  |   
          | Structured Questions (Data responses) |  |  |  |  |  |   
          | Oral |  |  |  |  |  |   
          | Observation |  |  |  |  |  |   
          | Self |  |  |  |  |  |   
     |